TRUSTING MY JUDGEMENT
needs a realistic basis!
PREVIOUS: Healthy Trust (#2)
SITE: re. Trust issues, brief Questionnaire
♟️ High Trust relationship are built on : Authenticity, Consistency, Empathy, Integrity & Transparency. (SITE “Cultivating Trust…..“)
♟️ DIMENSIONS : Main components of Trust
🔑 Assumed = It’s time dependent, built one action at a time. The more consistent your behavior, the more likely others are going to assume you’ll act the same way again.
🔑 Associative = Others will trust you based on the stories they’re heard / read about you, so you have the least influence or control over this aspect
OR – how you gauge your trust-level is based on preconceived stereotypes you may have (gender, race, wealth….)
OR – how similar or different someone is to you (comfort level familiarity)
🔑 Vulnerable = the fastest path to building trust with someone else is when both people… express vulnerability – the act of exposing oneself to possible harm, rejection, or scrutiny – in an effort to connect beyond a surface level relationship.
♟️ ASPECTS
🔆 Delayed Reciprocity – to create trust use the Golden Rule: ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’. If I do something for you now, I trust (hope, expect) that it will be repaid / returned, in some unspecified way at some unspecified time in the future.
🔆 Expose
d Vulnerability – in a trust arrangement you may be leaving yourself open to being taken advantage of. The threat of pay-back from someone or feeling guilty about asking may curb the temptation to exposed your ‘soft side’. We’re looking for fairness. So I feel that “for things to work between us successfully, I need to be able to trust that you won’t make me (or yourself) suffer”.
🔆 Predictability – it’s normal for people to make forecasts, trying to figure out what others will do or what will happen, for ourself personally & in the world in general. We want to spot & prepare for threats, as well as make plans to achieve longer-term goals. The point of greatest unpredictability is at 50%, so a reliable enemy is ‘safer’ than an unpredictable friend – at least we know where we stand with them.
🔆 Value Exchange – Most transactions in life are based on reciprocity, which works because we each
value things differently. You need food & have a skill, I have money & need a job done….. Trust in value-exchange occurs when you don’t know very much (or at all) about them, their intention or what they’re actually going to provide. AND you don’t know exactly if what you’re getting is what you asked for & expected.
HEALTHY – You are trustworthy if YOU :
♦︎ keep other people’s confidential information, secrets & vulnerabilities private (exception = when it’s dangerous to others or illegal)
♦︎ regularly follow through on your commitments & show up when / where you say you will be
♦︎ own your mistakes, offer genuine apologies, & then make amends
♦︎ set clear limits & respect those of others
♦︎ when appropriate, show empathy & provide support without harsh judgment
RECOVERY re. “UNDER-Trusting” post – Consider these positive internal responses in relation those who —
• are mean to us: Develop the ability & skill to stand up to them when appropriate & not a danger, or stay away from them altogether
• ignore us: Teach the WIC that no one can make us invisible! Some can see us & some cannot – it’s not a reflection on us (pun intended)! When we cover o a True Self we are visible to ourself & to those who have ‘eyes’, knowing that we can’t make “blind people see colors!” Everyone else is only a potential connection, but not a necessary one
• do have good boundaries: It’s not their job to rescue or parent us. The distress that gets triggered by their responses to us is from our old wounds, not their behavior. This pain needs to be owned & dealt with in Program, therapy & our spiritual practice.
🙂 And we can learn from these healthier people to develop our own limits & self-care. The ideal goal is to surround ourself with people who are genuinely trustworthy that will create a safe present & an even better future.
NEXT: Healthy Trust #3








surprise” for the umpteenth time when dealing with the same situation – again! as if it had never happened before
music. He’s thrilled & puts it on speaker. Sandi ‘hates’ Piaf (which he doesn’t know) & asks him to play it later. He wants to know why & she admits Piaf doesn’t suit her.